ࡱ> GIF` bjbjss 7:K s8tiii       $vh/iiiii/DiX i  `~U(GdZ0r% rrPiiiiiii//1Xiiiiiii  PointsRespect for other teamInformationRebuttalUse of facts and statisticsOrganizationUnderstanding of topicPresentation style5All statements, body language, and responses were respectful and in appropriate language.All information presented in this debate was clear, accurate, and thorough.All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics, and/or examples.All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly.Team consistently used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice, and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.4Statements and responses were respectful and used appropriate language, but once or twice body language was not.Most information presented in this debate was clear, accurate, and thorough.Most counter-arguments were accurate, relevant, and strong.Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics, and/or examples.Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease.Team usually used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.3Most statements and responses were respectful and in appropriate language, but there was one sarcastic remark.Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.Most counter-arguments were accurate and relevant, but several were weak.Every major point was supported with facts, statistics, and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.Team sometimes used gestures, eye contact, tone of voice and a level of enthusiasm in a way that kept the attention of the audience.2Statements, responses, and/or body language were borderline appropriate. Some sarcastic remarks.Some information was accurate, but there were some minor inaccuracies.Some counter-arguments were weak and irrelevant.Some points were well-supported, others were not.Arguments were not tied well to an idea.The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic, but didnt present with ease.One or more members of the team had a presentation style that did not keep attention.1Statements, responses, and/or body language were consistently not respectful.Information had some major inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant.Every point was not supported.Arguments were not tied to an idea at all.The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.The teams presentation style did not keep the attention of the audience.Points for CategoryTotal Points for Essay     Grading Rubric Example: Debate, Analytic Source: http://www.winona.edu/air/documents/classdebate.pdf )*2378:;@ADENO[\jkmnrs. / i j ( ) }}} hv1h6jCJOJQJ^JaJ hv1h CJOJQJ^JaJ hv1hrXCJOJQJ^JaJ hv1hrXCJOJQJ^JaJh"EJhrXCJaJh"EJ5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h"EJhrX5CJOJQJ^JaJ#h"EJh"EJ5CJOJQJ^JaJ1*3O\s/ j )  $Ifgd6j $Ifgd  $$Ifa$gd Ff$IfK    !   w x 2 3 '(EF =>no#$yz{}  AB`a01I±ޱޱ±ޱޱ±ޱޱ±ޱޱ hv1h CJOJQJ^JaJ hv1hrXCJOJQJ^JaJh hrXCJaJ hv1hrXCJOJQJ^JaJ hv1h6jCJOJQJ^JaJF  kdH$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT !  x 3 $Ifgd6j $Ifgd  $$Ifa$gd  kd$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT (F $Ifgd6j $Ifgd  $$Ifa$gd kd$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT>o$z $Ifgd6j $Ifgd  $$Ifa$gd z{kd$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT{} Ba $Ifgd6j $Ifgd  $$Ifa$gd kdh$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT)*+,-./0$If01 kd0$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQT1HIJKMNPQSTVWxvvvvvvvvvqgd"EJkd$$IfTl0/ - t09644 laQT$If IJKLNOQRTUWoѲh[ h"EJh[ CJOJQJ^JaJh"EJh[ 5OJQJ^Jh"EJh[ OJQJ^JhARjhARUh haCJaJh hrXCJaJ &dPgd"EJ51h0:pv1= /!"#$% $$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t965 5555aQpPT1kd$$IfTlִs{")/  t096    44 laQpPT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t96,5 5555aQT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t96,5 5555aQT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t96,5 5555aQT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t96,5 5555aQT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t96,5 5555aQT$$IfQ!vh5 5555555#v #v#v#v#v:Vl t965 5555aQTj$$IfQ!vh5 5-#v #v-:Vl t965 5-aQT@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontRi@R  Table Normal4 l4a (k(No List6U@6 a Hyperlink >*B*phj@j a Table Grid7:V04@4  Header  !4 @"4  Footer  !H2H v1 Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ :*3O\s/j)!x3(F> o $ z { } B a   ) * + , - . / 0 1 H I J K M N P Q S T V W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0h0h0h0h0h0h0h0h0@0@0h0h0*3O\/j)!x(F> o } B a K j0ЙYj0 j0 j0 j0  j0  j0  j0  j0  j0  j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0 j0% j0% j0% j0% j0% j0%  8j0@ 0t rrrrru I   z{01  8@0(  B S  ?K K M M N N P Q S T V W 9=K K M M N N P Q S T V W 3)*23NO[\rs$ y  J J K K M M N N P Q S T V W o  K K M M N N P Q S T V W +P [  v1"EJ7OARrX6ja)`v*3O\s/j)!x3(F> o $ z { } B a   ) * + , - . / 0 1 H I J @/ @UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : Arial5& zaTahoma"1h"CF[v v !4dE E 2HX ?a2 LETTER GRADESInformation TechnologyDavid Antony GreenOh+'0  (4 T ` l xLETTER GRADESInformation TechnologyNormalDavid Antony Green7Microsoft Office Word@J6@K5@l 1@3(Gv ՜.+,0 hp  ħԴE  LETTER GRADES Title  !"#$%'()*+,-./012345789:;<=?@ABCDEHRoot Entry F`'U(GJData 1Table&rWordDocument7:SummaryInformation(6DocumentSummaryInformation8>CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q